928mac;16292 wrote: This is very unfortunate that a disagreement
Just read what has transpired twice in the past week or so, after essentially no comments for a year, Roger chose to twice post making defaming statements about me, specifically using my name without any prior prompting or cause.
When challenged to back his statements up, in one case Roger demurred and in the other provided a post that did not prove his point.
In one post Roger claims I stated the 928 OC would "never" sponsor a dinner again. I challenged Roger to back this statement up, as I know it to be untrue. Instead he posts a rant without evidence that I said something would "never" happen.
In another post a member mentioned that there were accusations made in the past. To which I provided the "data point" that those accusations did not come from the 928 OC or any of its members and that the 928 OC had not requested financial disclosure from events in the past. The member accepted this comment without issue. Roger then posts an old statement where a request was made for an accounting of attendees, as though that defends his position.
There is no disagreement on rules, as Roger has not cited any.
Roger started his attacks on me just over a year ago. The cause has always been quite transparent to me, it has nothing to do with rules.
