Banned a trustee?

Thank you Austin for the clarification. I don't know what the issue is/was with Malcolm, but thank you anyway for the clarification.

stepson;11141 wrote: Thank you Austin for the clarification. I don't know what the issue is/was with Malcolm, but thank you anyway for the clarification.

John, do you have a suggestion or any input you wish to make regarding the handling of these accounts by disgruntled posters? As I explained to Jarrod, I welcome constructive input. These are your forums.

stepson;11139 wrote: Not everybody is out there to "get" you. This election is not about you. It is about James and Andrew and the lot.

Really, then why did you direct your comments to me?
Why not did you direct your comments to the moderators?
You made this issue about me, I did not.

stepson;11139 wrote: Not everybody is out there to "get" you. This election is not about you. It is about James and Andrew and the lot.

I would also point out that a Rennlist thread started by Malcolm, who neglected his request to be removed from the 928 OC forum, was immediately responded by several people, including some here, that stated I was behind the action...

It should be noted that Stan Shaw had nothing to do with these actions in regards to Sean's and Malcolm's accounts to the forum. I took the actions and they were supported by the other moderator, Brad.

KilnRed;11145 wrote: It should be noted that Stan Shaw had nothing to do with these actions in regards to Sean's and Malcolm's accounts to the forum. I took the actions and they were supported by the other moderator, Brad.

Hi Austin,

So it was you and Brad that stripped Malcolm of his Moderator status here on the 928OC Forums?

From the outside looking in that was what started all of this, at least from Malcolm's side.

It would nice to hear the explanation for what caused this action against Malcolm, if that is OK to ask.