16v Twin screw

OBehave;1569 wrote: That was my offer and we both seem to be on the same page.I want to build,he wants to sell.Let's see where we go in the next few weeks. Ed

That would be great, David would have a 928 fanatic with an already demonstrated high quality product to rely on. I hope it works out well for both of you!

So, the Frenzy was a great event, at least for this!

Why not just use Centrifugal superchargers
www.google.ca/images?client=safari&rls=e...wAw&biw=1425&bih=726


http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTRIyb2LLa3u-Cj2WePTXhrEZfJvlR3xnlFPjkPC2QGHFG_dMA&t=1&usg=__l-5Mkgp1YD3kbIhZQRUSnk9e_rI=

Or Bolt bolt this little pressure monster on

Ed, I want a couple of your revised water pumps. One for the '86 we have and one for my '84 also. Obviously, I'm not concerned about bending valves on the '84 but it would still be nice to have the added insurance that the block wouldn't be damaged by the impeller if such a failure occurred. How common is the impeller damage anyway?

928mac;1574 wrote: Why not just use Centrifugal superchargers

I think some drivers prefer the lower rpm boost advantage of the twin screw.

Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net;1577 wrote: I think some drivers prefer the lower rpm boost advantage of the twin screw.

Will not a larger pulley on the crank and a smaller one on the blower help?
I have never played with SC that much.

I think that would help a bit, but it will take away from the top end also.

Generally twin screw loses something at the top end and centrifugal gives up something at the bottom end, from my understanding.